Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tommy Paul vs Hamad Medjedovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Medjedovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Tommy Paul vs Hamad Medjedovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paul 0 - 0 Medjedovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 55.11% of points on his second serve, while Medjedovic has won 54.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 53.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medjedovic has won 51.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.6% and 32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 67.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medjedovic has saved 57.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 63.01% of matches played (W/L 46/ 27), with Medjedovic winning 66.67% (W/L 34/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 120/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 22/ 14). Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 20/ 12), where as Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 10/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 141 while Medjedovic has played against players with an average rank of 225.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medjedovic has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 41.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medjedovic has converted 44.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
14
Rank
12
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
134
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
64% (403-231)
Career Total W/L
63% (115-68)
70% (19-8)
YTD W/L
67% (10-5)
$5,764,800
Career Prize Money
$362,660
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paul VS Medjedovic H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tommy Paul | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (19/8) | 67% (10/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (46/22) | 63% (22/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (351/282) | 55% (181/150) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 82% (9/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.79 |
| Aces Total | 136 | 127 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:21 | 1:33:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.74 | 198.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1241/2034) | 63% (621/984) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (876/1241) | 73% (456/621) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (437/793) | 55% (199/363) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (88/212) | 45% (45/101) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (866/2096) | 40% (415/1036) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 69% (9/4) | 78% (7/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (17/23) | 67% (10/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 50% (6/3) |
Tommy Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
45 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
69%
(
81 of
117)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
53 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniil Medvedev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Dominik Koepfer
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Aslan Karatsev
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Lukas Klein
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tommy Paul
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Casper Ruud
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Lucas Pouille
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alexei Popyrin
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Laurent Lokoli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
20
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Francisco Comesana
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Medjedovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
